Neither ChatGPT nor Gemini autonomous AI agents have a serious reliability problem, and they have documented it with compelling figures
Labrador-sized dinosaur discovered in U.S. was fast, mysterious and lived 150 million years ago
Confirmed Georgia is already refunding up to $500 per taxpayer and these are the key dates to receive it
Use someSharkNinja pressure cookers with caution! Lauren Wolf-Bond has filed a complaint against the company, alleging that it distributes faulty pressure cookers, particularly the Foodi OP300 model, which can result in severe burns. Although the corporation has recalled over 1.8 million goods, it wasn’t sufficient to address every problem.
These lawsuits are more frequent than you may imagine; sometimes businesses and consumers can come to an arrangement, and other times they can’t. Let’s take a closer look at what transpired.
SharkNinja and its pressure cookers
This American business is well-known for selling electric cookers, air fryers, and blenders, among other home appliances. However, following a bad experience when a customer named Lauren Wolf-Bond filed a lawsuit against them, they might have lost the faith of numerous customers.
This complaint, which was filed in May 2025 at a federal court in Massachusetts, concerns a significant problem with the company’s electric pressure cookers, particularly the Foodi OP300 model.
The lawsuit in detail
According to Lauren, there is a manufacturing or design flaw in the pressure cookers that causes the lid to open while the cooker is in operation. Because the hot food, steam, or boiling liquids inside the cooker might escape and seriously burn anyone around, this is extremely dangerous.
In addition to the loss, the lawsuit alleges that SharkNinja should have been aware of this circumstance prior to selling these products, given that the business regularly has to conduct internal engineering analyses, quality assurance procedures, consumer complaints, warranty claims, and pre-market testing.
The lawsuit claims that the business failed to alert clients to the risk despite potential knowledge of the flaw. SharkNinja is charged with reckless behavior because of this.
Recall
More than 1.8 million Foodi OP300 pressure cookers in the US were voluntarily recalled by SharkNinja in May 2025. The lawsuit contends, however, that this is insufficient because they only provided a fix and left no room for a replacement or a refund. Furthermore, problems including the product’s continued hazard, lack of confidence in its ability to perform its primary job, and decreased value were not resolved by the company’s remedy.
Lawsuit s aim
All Americans who have purchased one of these faulty products for their own use will be represented in this complex case. Thus, the purpose of this case is to:
- Be recognized as a class action.
- Make SharkNinja to recall every defective model that is still in the market.
- Affected customers receive a real and safe solution.
- These consumers get financially compensated because of: health and safety risk, product s value loss, and the impossibility of using the household appliance in a safe way.
Another point of contention is that SharkNinja broke federal and state consumer protection laws, such as those against deceptive advertising, unjust enrichment, and warranty violations, in California.
What happens now?
The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts has registered this case with the number 1:25-cv-11314, Wolf-Bond v. SharkNinja Operating LLC. Several attorneys from Laukaitis Law LLC and Siri & Glimstad LLP are representing Lauren.
Although the outcome is uncertain, one thing is certain: whenever significant circumstances arise, consumers must exercise their right to file a claim. The best course of action is to make it public in order to prevent other incidents because people’s safety is at risk. For this reason, SharkNinja’s suggested remedy was absurd for the impacted customers. In this scenario, let’s hope justice is done. Do you believe that Lauren was correct to file a claim against SharkNinja?
